Play Therapy at Home—Setting Limits with Empathy

Structure That Helps Children Feel Safe

a child crosses his arms in anger

Every parent reaches moments where a limit needs to be set.

A child refuses to leave the park.
A child throws something across the room.
A child hits, yells, or becomes physically unsafe.
A child resists something that cannot change.

In these moments, parents often feel pulled between two unhelpful extremes: being overly strict and losing connection, or giving in and losing structure.

In Child-Centered Play Therapy, we work from a different understanding:

Limits and connection work together to help children feel safe enough to regulate.

Why Limits Matter

Children need limits.

Not as punishment, and not because something is wrong with them, but because limits create:

  • Emotional safety

  • Predictability

  • Boundaries that support regulation

  • Protection for people and relationships

  • A sense of stability when emotions feel big

Without limits, children are left holding emotional experiences that are often too large for them to manage alone.

But limits are only effective when they are delivered in a way that preserves connection.

The ACT Model of Limit Setting

In Child-Centered Play Therapy, limits are most effective when they follow a simple structure:

A — Acknowledge feelings

C — Communicate the limit

T — Target alternatives using choices

This model keeps the interaction grounded, predictable, and emotionally safe.

A — Acknowledge Feelings

Before anything else, we name what the child is experiencing.

This is not agreement with behavior. It is recognition of emotional experience.

  • “You are really upset right now.”

  • “You don’t want to stop playing.”

  • “You are angry that it is time to leave.”

This step helps the child feel seen before any boundary is introduced.

C — Communicate the Limit

The limit is stated simply, calmly, and without judgment.

In this model, we use clear, non-global language:

  • “I am not for hitting.”

  • “Toys are not for throwing.”

  • “People are not for hurting.”

  • “Toys are not for breaking.”

This language is important because it:

  • Separates the child from the behavior

  • Avoids shaming or escalation

  • Keeps the message emotionally neutral

  • Clearly identifies what is not acceptable

The limit is not a correction. It is a steady boundary.

T — Target Alternatives Using Choices

After acknowledging emotion and stating the limit, we support the child with structured choices that align with the feeling or desire that is being expressed.

We use consistent language:

“You can choose ___ or you can choose ___.”

This step returns responsibility while maintaining connection. And remember, only offer a choice that you are actually ok with them choosing!

Example 1: Hitting

  • “You are really angry right now.” (A)

  • “I am not for hitting.” (C)

  • “You can choose to hit this pillow, or you can choose clench your hands as hard as you can.” (T)

Example 2: Leaving the park

  • “You are really upset that it is time to go.” (A)

  • “It is time to leave the park.” (C)

  • “You can choose to walk with me, or you can choose for me to carry you.” (T)

Example 3: Throwing objects

  • “You are having a big burst of energy right now.” (A)

  • “Toys are not for throwing.” (C)

  • “You can choose to throw these soft balls, or you can choose to run as fast as you can outside.” (T)

Example 4: Breaking things

  • “You are really frustrated.” (A)

  • “Toys are not for breaking.” (C)

  • “You can choose to tear up this cardboard box, or you can choose to stomp this cardboard box.” (T)

Why This Works

This model is effective because it holds two experiences at the same time:

  • The child’s emotional experience is acknowledged

  • The behavioral limit is clearly maintained

When both are present, children are more able to stay regulated even in moments of distress.

In Child-Centered Play Therapy, this mirrors what happens in the playroom. Children are allowed emotional expression within a consistent, structured relationship. Over time, they internalize that structure and begin to regulate more independently. They also learn that they are responsible for making choices, even when they may be dysregulated.

Consistency Builds Safety

Children learn through patterns, not single moments.

When ACT is used consistently, children begin to learn:

  • My feelings are allowed

  • My behavior has limits

  • The adult stays steady even when I am not

  • I am still connected, even when I am upset

When limits are inconsistent, children often escalate, not because they are “testing,” but because they are trying to understand what is stable. Children are prone to see where the lines are, it is our job as adults to toe the line and keep the limits clear and predictable.

Consistency is what turns limits into safety.

A Simple Practice for This Week

Choose one or two moments each day where a limit is needed.

Practice the ACT sequence:

  • Acknowledge the feeling

  • State the limit clearly

  • Offer two structured choices (that address the initial feeling or desire)

Keep language simple, calm, and steady. There is no need for perfection.

Over time, these moments reduce power struggles and strengthen the relationship between parent and child.

Coming Next in the Play Therapy at Home Series

Next, we’ll explore returning responsibility, and how children build confidence and independence when adults allow space for problem-solving, mastery, and growth.

Play Therapy at Home Series

Practical parenting tools inspired by Child-Centered Play Therapy

While parents are not expected to become play therapists, many of the skills used in Child-Centered Play Therapy can strengthen relationships, improve communication, and support children's emotional development at home. In this series, we'll explore practical tools that parents can use in everyday interactions with their children. Each skill is simple to learn but can have a powerful impact on connection, confidence, emotional regulation, and resilience.

References

Bratton, S. C., Landreth, G. L., Kellam, T., & Blackard, S. R. (2006). Child parent relationship therapy (CPRT): An evidence-based 10-session filial therapy model. Routledge.

Cochran, N. H., Nordling, W. J., & Cochran, J. L. (2010). Child-centered play therapy. Wiley.

Ginsburg, K. R. (2015). Building resilience in children and teens. American Academy of Pediatrics.

Landreth, G. L. (2012). Play therapy: The art of the relationship (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Ray, D. C. (2011). Advanced play therapy: Essential conditions, knowledge, and skills for child practice. Routledge.

VanFleet, R., Sywulak, A. E., & Sniscak, C. C. (2010). Child-centered play therapy. Guilford Press.

Sara Powers

Sara is a licensed MFT living in her hometown of San Luis Obispo.

https://sarapowerstherapy.com
Next
Next

Play Therapy at Home—Offering Choices